Philosophy Anti-Philosophy

Philosophers logicking on Identity

(This is a long post which I have been unable to break up.  Take it in stages.)    Philosophers since Plato have worried at what exactly Identity and Personal Identity are. They do this by logicking on the words (or ‘concepts’).  The literal  meaning of ‘identity’ from its Greek origins is ‘sameness’ or ‘state of being the same’.  But this is not enough for philosophers. Identity, or what it is…

No Comments
Bernard Williams Philosophy Anti-Philosophy

Bernard Williams 2: Self-hood, Cogito, Freedom of the Will

Self-hood or Personal Identity. (What I have written here is the same as in my post on Identity, here.; and represents my understanding of BW from here.)    BW  logicked his way through the question of whether Self-hood or Personal Identity belongs to one’s body or one’s mind.  It seems he was speculating on what ordinary people’s intuitions on this matter are, rather than offering a theory of his own. …

No Comments
Bernard Williams Philosophy Anti-Philosophy

Bernard Williams 1: Morality

How did I have the presumption to write a post on Bernard Williams’s Moral Philosophy when I didn’t understand much of what I found on the Web on it?  It was because I still felt a presumption to say something. [My major difficulty was a lack of sites in which his logicking was translated for non-philosophers to understand.  Perhaps BW was as yet of too recent a vintage and of…

No Comments
Philosophy Anti-Philosophy Structuralism Linguistics

Saussure’s Structuralist Linguistics

I have gone through the numerous articles on Saussure’s Structuralism of Language three times, and been beaten back each time by my disbelief that it could have been taken seriously as science or philosophy. . Structuralism from its beginning seems to me to have been handing out nothing but the most obvious of  truisms.  Saussure, for a start, tells us that things in the world don’t come with the right…

No Comments
Philosophy Anti-Philosophy Plato

Plato 1: What precisely were his Forms?

Plato, like all the philosophers who followed him, was an example of human insensibility to human life, of reductionism of human life  and of the sensory experience that forms our lives, of severe abstractionism and generalization. These terms I have used in the above paragraph come straight from F.R. Leavis.  I don’t even understand them completely but they are the closest I have yet found to expressing my exasperation with…

No Comments
Philosophy Anti-Philosophy Descartes

Descartes 2: He drops the Cogito

Descartes later cheated on himself by using entirely separate arguments, not deduced from the Cogito, to prove that God did after all exist and that He was not a Great Deceiver who would deceive Descartes about what came to him via his senses.  So Descartes could now accept what his senses told him, and discard Cogito ergo Sum entirely! His arguments that God existed were painfully feeble.  But they gave him…

Philosophy Anti-Philosophy Descartes

Descartes 1: schoolboy-level philosophizing, the Cogito.

Let me jump to about 1637 AD for another example of the pottiness of Philosophy:  ‘Cogito ergo Sum’ – ‘I think, therefore I am’ – wrote Descartes.    Descartes couldn’t convince himself he existed till it occurred to him that he was thinking!  Therefore he must exist!  Did he really think as an adult person that he couldn’t believe he existed until the logic of words proved it?   He later  changed…

No Comments
Philosophy Anti-Philosophy History of Philosophy Socrates

Socrates: What’s Wrong with his Philosophizing?

I find it difficult now to recapture my sense of let-down when I first came across him.  His whole message was that the important thing in life is rational thought – being logical – and that it automatically leads to ethical behaviour.  He even thought that it transports the philosopher to heaven. It is an enormity of rationalistic narrow-mindedness and limitation. It has only to do with the rationalistic thought…

No Comments
Philosophy Anti-Philosophy Logic

What’s Wrong with Philosophy? 1: it’s just verbal logicking

What defines the philosopher is firstly his commitment to verbal logicking as the path to knowledge; and secondly, a lack of human sensibility to human life, which I shall go into in my next post.  These are the two concepts that are the nearest I have yet got to understanding my exasperation with Philosophy. The small thing that is missing from Philosophy and Philosophers is human self-knowledge.  It is something…

Philosophy Anti-Philosophy History of Philosophy

What’s Wrong with Philosophy? 7: History of Philosophy

THE LATER GREEK PHILOSOPHERS I was amazed by Socrates the first time I came across him, sitting in the empty market-place before breakfast with people gathered round him, and drawing them out with his quizzing.  He asked questions like: What is Courage? What is Virtue? What is Duty? and asked them one by one to come up with their examples of each.  Some of these examples were contradictory to each…

1 Comment