Monthly Archives

March 2020

Philosophy Anti-Philosophy Plato

Plato 1: What precisely were his Forms?

Plato, like all the philosophers who followed him, was an example of human insensibility to human life, of reductionism of human life  and of the sensory experience that forms our lives, of severe abstractionism and generalization. These terms I have used in the above paragraph come straight from F.R. Leavis.  I don’t even understand them completely but they are the closest I have yet found to expressing my exasperation with…

No Comments
South Africa Apartheid White liberals

South African liberals fled to whiter colonies

Where have so many white liberals of South Africa dribbled away to, in the decades since 1948 when apartheid started?  They’ve gone to colonialist countries that practise liberal democracy to their heart’s content because that’s what Western White people do.  The few natives who were originally there, were further reduced by genocides, by John Wayne and the US cavalry, and by Australian armed police (as I choose to believe).  The…

No Comments
Philosophy Anti-Philosophy Descartes

Descartes 2: He drops the Cogito

Descartes later cheated on himself by using entirely separate arguments, not deduced from the Cogito, to prove that God did after all exist and that He was not a Great Deceiver who would deceive Descartes about what came to him via his senses.  So Descartes could now accept what his senses told him, and discard Cogito ergo Sum entirely! His arguments that God existed were painfully feeble.  But they gave him…

4 Comments
Philosophy Anti-Philosophy Descartes

Descartes 1: schoolboy-level philosophizing, the Cogito.

Let me jump to about 1637 AD for another example of the pottiness of Philosophy:  ‘Cogito ergo Sum’ – ‘I think, therefore I am’ – wrote Descartes.    Descartes couldn’t convince himself he existed till it occurred to him that he was thinking!  Therefore he must exist!  Did he really think as an adult person that he couldn’t believe he existed until the logic of words proved it?   He later  changed…

No Comments
Philosophy Anti-Philosophy History of Philosophy Socrates

Socrates: What’s Wrong with his Philosophizing?

I find it difficult now to recapture my sense of let-down when I first came across him.  His whole message was that the important thing in life is rational thought – being logical – and that it automatically leads to ethical behaviour.  He even thought that it transports the philosopher to heaven. It is an enormity of rationalistic narrow-mindedness and limitation. It has only to do with the rationalistic thought…

No Comments